Wednesday, November 12, 2008

It's All For The Children

As you all know, California passed Prop. 8, making it illegal for homosexuals to marry.  But did you know that it is now also illegal for both homosexual and heterosexual couples that are not married to adopt children?  
According to an Op-Ed article in The New York Times, Arkansas passed the Proposed Initiative Act No. 1 by a 57 % vote.  The law bans those who are not legally married from being foster parents or adopting children.  The law bans both gay and straight couples, but the Arkansas Family Council (who sponsored the law) has stated that it was written specifically to thwart "the gay agenda".  Hold on a sec - "the gay agenda"?  Does anyone else have a problem with that sentence?  I thought gays just wanted to be able to live their lives that way they wanted, the way that they're comfortable with, and maybe get married and have children, like anybody else.  Turns out maybe they've got an ulterior motive - like, say, any and all Muslims?

Well, this law is supposed to help children, by limiting their parents to only those who are married.  Sounds like the Arkansas Family Council believes that only married couples are fit to be parents.  But wait - where's the research to show that that's true?  Did they ever consider that being married does not automatically make you a good parent? (answer: of course they didn't - they're the Family Council, so they know what's best for parents)  

Here's another problem with the law: this can destroy families.  Say that a parent passes away - what happens to their child?  It used to be that a relative could adopt the child - something that I think we all would feel comfortable with for our child, and a situation in which the child would undoubtably feel more secure and comfortable in.  But now, unless that relative is married, the child is screwed - it's off to a foster home, or into state custody until they get adopted.  I can only imagine the terror and uncertainty the child must feel.  Now, yes, I know that there are many children that would not get a chance to live with relatives anyway, because they don't have relatives - but for those that do, it must be all the worse knowing that they could have gone to live with a family member.

So now gays are screwed - absolutely no way for them to have children.  Can't have children unless they're married, and can't get married.  But here's a scary thought: how long until the social conservatives decide that they should have the final word in any aspect of child-rearing - including whether we're "fit" to care for our own biological children?  Think about it - it's not that big a step away.

2 comments:

emilya said...

I think it is awful especially because a child should definitely be able to go live with a single aunt or uncle if their parents pass away. They would be a lot more comfortable being with a family member; it doesn’t matter if they are single it is better then being sent to be with strangers; maybe not even put into a family after an awful and traumatizing thing had just happened.

Anonymous said...

I personally think that this law is rediculous because every family is different and noone truly has a "nuclear family." With that being said, society religious and behavoral roles is being forced on to society, which is of course unfair.